In May, the neighborhood’s Crime-V app offered Cities its 30,000 user base users to search for suspicious rsonists on live video, only to find that they had sent a mob of citizens after the wrong person. Now, Citizen secretly hires reporters for ડો 25 per hour through third-party websites for live streaming on the app on secret scenes. I’m tired

When Citizens first hit the App Store in 2016 it was called Vigilante – it sold itself as a platform to fight injustice with transparency, which sounds good in theory, but in practice, it knowingly encourages users to report crime scenes to them. Is. . Vigilante was removed from the App Store for violating a clause in Apple’s app developer review guidelines stating that the app “is not likely to cause physical harm from its use.”

Sure, this will be the end for an exciting platform. But like the cockroach after Apocalypse, the application continued. He re-named himself as a citizen, adding that no one interfered in the crime scene, re-entered the App Store and continued to raise VC funds. Now, the app is like a mob-driven crime – its app store page says, “Citizens can report a crime in progress before the police respond.” But this level of hypervigilance can trigger panic, making people feel safe – not to mention that incidents of crime reported by the user can be false at best, and racist at worst. The application pulls data from 911 calls, but not all information in that dispatch can be verified, which can cause false concern.

But the citizen can only act if he has enough user support, and his efforts to harass the citizens to use the application have become more and more desperate. According to CensorTower, in June 2020, the app hit monthly downloads in the wake of widespread protests against Black Lives Matter. (So, protesting the country’s police brutality, 677,000 people responded by downloading the policing app). But in the following months, only 207,000 people downloaded the app, since then, growth has been very steady – 292,000 people downloaded Citizen in March 2020, and 283,000 people downloaded it in March 2021.

In June, the Daily Dot reported that a typical user named “Landon” was streaming live from several crime scenes in a single day, trying to visit witnesses and first responders – seeing how often he stumbled upon these crime scenes. , It seemed unlikely that just what an enthusiastic app user is. Yesterday, the New York Post reported on another user named “Chris” who dreamed of a citizen out of six crises in one day. Citiz confirmed that both Landon and Chris are working for the app as members of its street team.

“Citizens have teams in some cities where the app is available to demonstrate how the platform works, and to model a responsible broadcast system in situations when events unfold in real time. We believe these teams will help guide our users on how to broadcast effectively, helpfully and safely, ”a Citizen spokesperson told TechCrunch.

Citizen has had street teams since the inception of the application; The spokesman said they never tried to hide this. But this job is not listed on the Citizen website. Instead, they are listed on the Journalism Jobs Board without mentioning Citizens by a third party recruitment called Flyover Entertainment. An NYU journalism website shared a similar list, which did not include the citizen’s name. Citizen confirmed to TechCrunch that both of these lists are for the app’s street team. Citizen, L.A. Pays 250 250 per day for a 10-hour shift in, and $ 200 per day for an 8-hour shift in NYC, which comes to $ 25 per hour.

“Broadcast journalists have the experience of broadcasting safely and responsibly. This is essential for our street team members, ”said a Citizen spokesperson. When asked why these jobs are posted on third-party job boards, but not on the citizen’s own website, the spokesman reiterated that it was because the citizen wanted to find special reporters. However, it could possibly find journalists on its own website.

Surveillance puts state vigilance matters aside, local news is dying, and is not designed to be a substitute for civilian neighborhood journalism. Sure, local newspapers also report on crime, and it’s not like Citizen is doing something unprecedented by sending reporters to crime scenes. But the difference between reporting news from a crime scene on a surveillance application and a live stream is that there is only one paid worker and the average citizen when asked directly. For an application that is based on “increasing transparency”, these covered job postings may not seem so transparent. Plus, for no benefit or unrestricted freelance gig, the need to establish broadcast skills is $ 25 per hour is an amazing rate.

Now, Citizen’s latest effort for development is a paid service for ect 19.99 per month called Protect, which can send users from their cameras to their location and livestream Protect Agent. Citizen says its protect agents include former law enforcement officers and 911 operators, who can send an “instant emergency response” in case of an emergency. This kind of pays to get an individual 911 operator, which, again, seems like a weak alternative to policing, an already weak system.

Perhaps Silicon Valley-breed tech companies, police vandalism, ethnic configuration and surveillance are not the answer to the United States’ centuries-old crisis. A better way to reduce crime is to ensure that everyone has access to health care, jobs and affordable housing. who knows!